U.S. policy shift leads to $9.7M contraceptive stockpile facing incineration in Belgium, sparking debate over Western values and African sovereignty
Newsroom (31/07/2025, Gaudium Press ) The impending incineration of nearly $10 million worth of U.S.-funded contraceptives—initially intended for African countries but stalled in Belgium—has ignited international debate, bringing to the fore long-standing tensions over Western development aid, population control, and cultural sovereignty on the African continent.
Stored in a Belgian warehouse since the reinstatement of the Mexico City Policy by the Trump administration, the contraceptives—comprising over 26 million condoms, injectable birth control, implants, oral contraceptives, and HIV prevention medications—are now slated for destruction at a cost of approximately $160,000. Despite offers from the United Nations and reproductive health NGOs to redirect the supplies, the U.S. government has refused to reallocate the stockpile, citing ideological grounds.
For African Christian leaders, this decision represents a moral victory.
“We need to be open-eyed; those contraceptives must not set foot in Africa,” said Ann Kioko, Campaigns Director for CitizenGo Africa. “I am very happy that the Mexico City Policy signed by President Trump is in effect and that the contraception will be incinerated.”
Ms. Kioko, along with other conservative advocates across the continent, argues that the shipment represents more than just health commodities—it symbolizes what they view as a foreign-led population control agenda, masquerading as aid.
“What US$9.7 million could do for Africa’s development if redirected is unimaginable,” she said, calling on African nations to reject repackaged contraceptives and denouncing international reproductive health providers like MSI Reproductive Choices and the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) for, in her words, “peddling a culture of death.”
The U.S. decision to incinerate the contraceptives rather than allow redistribution follows the reactivation of the Mexico City Policy in 2017. The policy, first introduced by President Ronald Reagan in 1984, prohibits U.S. funding for foreign NGOs that perform or actively promote abortion. While defenders view the policy as a safeguard for pro-life ethics, critics argue it restricts access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare in developing nations.
Belgium, where the contraceptives are currently held, has sought alternative options to avoid the destruction. The country’s foreign ministry said it had “explored all possible options to prevent the destruction,” but ultimately found “no viable alternative could be secured.”
“Sexual and reproductive health must not be subject to ideological constraints,” the ministry added, underscoring Europe’s generally liberal stance on reproductive rights.
However, for African Christian leaders, the controversy presents an opportunity to reassert local values against what they perceive as cultural imperialism.
“This is both a political statement and a moral imperative,” said Senior Counsel Charles Kanjama, Chair of the Kenya Christian Professionals Forum (KCPF). “Abortion and abortifacient contraception cause harm, and that’s what must be stopped.”
The planned incineration of the U.S.-funded contraceptives is in line with pro-life principles as stipulated in the March 1995 Encyclical Letter of John Paul II on the value and inviolability of human life, Evangelium Vitae.
Mr. Kanjama echoed Kioko’s criticism of foreign influence under the guise of aid, warning against what he described as ideologically driven assistance tied to sexuality education, abortion, and LGBTQ+ advocacy.
“Foreign ideologies have been shoved down our throats, especially from Western nations,” he said. “To the extent that there is now any revision in that approach by the West, we welcome it.”
“We welcome genuine aid, tut that aid must not come together with foreign ideologies being forced upon us contrary to our moral and family values,” he said.
According to Mr. Kanjama, the debate reveals a deeper cultural and spiritual struggle. “Morality and politics are intertwined. Politics influences culture, and culture influences how we treat life,” he said, defending the U.S. policy as protecting the sanctity of life “from conception to natural death.”
Western Aid and African Values: A Long-standing Tension
The controversy highlights broader concerns about Western aid conditionalities in Africa. Critics on the continent say that financial assistance often comes with strings attached, requiring recipient countries to adopt policies that clash with local beliefs and traditions—particularly in areas of reproductive health and family planning.
“Development doesn’t happen instantaneously, and vulnerable populations will always exist, but that doesn’t mean we should accept help that compromises our dignity,” said Mr. Kanjama. “We must promote self-sufficiency and local solutions rooted in our own values.”
This perspective aligns with growing calls across Africa for a shift from dependency on donor-driven programs to fair trade, homegrown innovation, and cultural sovereignty.
“We believe the first thing African countries need is fair trade,” Mr. Kanjama said. “Sometimes aid is used to mask very unfair trading practices.”
In a continent where foreign aid still plays a significant role in health and development programs, such assertions challenge the status quo of international cooperation and question the motivations behind Western support.
A Moment for the Church to Lead?
Both Kioko and Kanjama called on the Catholic Church to intensify its leadership role, advocating for ethical healthcare approaches consistent with Catholic teachings. They urged Catholic agencies such as Caritas and the Pontifical Academy for Life to increase investments in natural family planning, maternal care, and faith-based health initiatives.
“This is a moment for the Church to lead,” Kanjama said, invoking the example of St. Teresa of Calcutta. “Even in poor areas, the poor can still find other poor people to help.”
For these leaders, the Church must be more than a moral compass—it must become a development partner that offers an alternative to what they see as a Western-dominated aid model.
A Global Controversy, A Local Reckoning
While international media has largely focused on the economic waste of destroying viable contraceptives, in Africa, the issue touches deeper questions about autonomy, morality, and identity.
“This is not a third-world issue,” Mr. Kanjama said. “The sanctity of life is not negotiable.”
As millions of dollars’ worth of contraceptives await incineration in Europe, the flames are also fanning a debate across Africa: not just about what kind of aid the continent receives, but about whose values shape its future.
- Raju Hasmukh with files from ACI Africa
Related Images:
